<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 79 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208684</link>
    <description>The appeal, concerning reimbursement of medical expenses for a retired employee under the Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS), was initially time-barred but proceeded after an application for condonation of delay. The court affirmed that retired employees are entitled to reimbursement under CGHS, irrespective of registration or contributions. Citing Delhi High Court precedents, it emphasized full reimbursement entitlement, employer obligation, and approval-listed hospital treatment eligibility. The appellant&#039;s failure to challenge these legal principles led to the appeal&#039;s dismissal, upholding the reimbursement order for the retired employee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 79 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208684</link>
      <description>The appeal, concerning reimbursement of medical expenses for a retired employee under the Central Government Health Scheme (CGHS), was initially time-barred but proceeded after an application for condonation of delay. The court affirmed that retired employees are entitled to reimbursement under CGHS, irrespective of registration or contributions. Citing Delhi High Court precedents, it emphasized full reimbursement entitlement, employer obligation, and approval-listed hospital treatment eligibility. The appellant&#039;s failure to challenge these legal principles led to the appeal&#039;s dismissal, upholding the reimbursement order for the retired employee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>