https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208680 The Government upheld the Order-in-Appeal, rejecting the Revision Applications due to the Appellant's involvement in fraudulent export cases. The penalty imposed under Section 114(iii) of the Customs Act was upheld, emphasizing statutory duties and adherence to regulations. The decision was based on findings of fraud and involvement as a Customs House Agent, leading to the rejection of the Revision Applications and conclusion of legal proceedings. en-us Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208680 The Government upheld the Order-in-Appeal, rejecting the Revision Applications due to the Appellant's involvement in fraudulent export cases. The penalty imposed under Section 114(iii) of the Customs Act was upheld, emphasizing statutory duties and adherence to regulations. The decision was based on findings of fraud and involvement as a Customs House Agent, leading to the rejection of the Revision Applications and conclusion of legal proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208680