<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 441 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208679</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of with directions for the original authority to reevaluate the case on merits, particularly focusing on the crucial issue of whether the capital goods were returned on payment of duty. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fresh decision considering all aspects and granted the party a reasonable opportunity to be heard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 07:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 441 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208679</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of with directions for the original authority to reevaluate the case on merits, particularly focusing on the crucial issue of whether the capital goods were returned on payment of duty. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fresh decision considering all aspects and granted the party a reasonable opportunity to be heard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208679</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>