<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 285 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208676</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter back to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration regarding the waiver of pre-deposit of duty and CENVAT credit availed on fake/bogus/non-existent invoices. The Tribunal found the amount deposited by the appellant sufficient to hear the appeal and decided to take up the appeal on merit, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal principles and precedents in the reconsideration process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 285 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208676</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the matter back to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration regarding the waiver of pre-deposit of duty and CENVAT credit availed on fake/bogus/non-existent invoices. The Tribunal found the amount deposited by the appellant sufficient to hear the appeal and decided to take up the appeal on merit, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal principles and precedents in the reconsideration process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>