<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 807 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208674</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the demand for suppressed production of ingots from January 1, 1993, to January 17, 1993, due to evidence found in private records of the appellant&#039;s employees. The burden of proof was on the appellant to show the records were incorrect. The Court found no illegality in the determination and dismissed the appeal as no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 807 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208674</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the demand for suppressed production of ingots from January 1, 1993, to January 17, 1993, due to evidence found in private records of the appellant&#039;s employees. The burden of proof was on the appellant to show the records were incorrect. The Court found no illegality in the determination and dismissed the appeal as no substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>