https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208659 The tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the addition of on-money for the flat purchase and upholding the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer. The burden of proof regarding unexplained investments was not met by the appellant, and attempts to introduce additional grounds of appeal were rejected due to procedural shortcomings. en-us Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 May 2013 18:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208659 The tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the addition of on-money for the flat purchase and upholding the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer. The burden of proof regarding unexplained investments was not met by the appellant, and attempts to introduce additional grounds of appeal were rejected due to procedural shortcomings. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208659