<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 435 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208646</link>
    <description>Duty on an excisable intermediate product arises only if the product is independently shown, on evidence relating to that product, to be marketable or capable of being sold as goods. Actual sale is not decisive, but the department must establish marketability by examining the material on record; a finding based only on the exemptibility or marketability of the final product is insufficient. Applying that principle, the finding on sugar invert syrup could not be sustained. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication on marketability after granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182108" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 435 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208646</link>
      <description>Duty on an excisable intermediate product arises only if the product is independently shown, on evidence relating to that product, to be marketable or capable of being sold as goods. Actual sale is not decisive, but the department must establish marketability by examining the material on record; a finding based only on the exemptibility or marketability of the final product is insufficient. Applying that principle, the finding on sugar invert syrup could not be sustained. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication on marketability after granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>