<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 68 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208641</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the denial of rebate benefits to the petitioner-company under a Circular, citing a pending show cause notice. The Court emphasized that the petitioner was excluded from the Circular&#039;s benefit due to the ongoing adjudication process, refraining from delving into the notice&#039;s validity. The Court acknowledged the petitioner&#039;s objections to the show cause notice regarding Service Tax on &#039;Intellectual Property Services&#039; but found no grounds to interfere, given the ongoing adjudication process and the petitioner&#039;s ineligibility for rebate under the Circular due to the pending notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 68 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208641</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the denial of rebate benefits to the petitioner-company under a Circular, citing a pending show cause notice. The Court emphasized that the petitioner was excluded from the Circular&#039;s benefit due to the ongoing adjudication process, refraining from delving into the notice&#039;s validity. The Court acknowledged the petitioner&#039;s objections to the show cause notice regarding Service Tax on &#039;Intellectual Property Services&#039; but found no grounds to interfere, given the ongoing adjudication process and the petitioner&#039;s ineligibility for rebate under the Circular due to the pending notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208641</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>