<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 65 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208633</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,65,000 under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, finding sufficient evidence to establish the genuineness of the loan from M/s Vardhman Trading Company. The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s application of the legal principles under section 68 and determining no legal infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 65 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208633</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,65,000 under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, finding sufficient evidence to establish the genuineness of the loan from M/s Vardhman Trading Company. The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s application of the legal principles under section 68 and determining no legal infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>