<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 682 - ITAT, CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208631</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal upheld that the capital gain from the property sale was short-term, based on the property being held for less than 36 months. The cost of the land to the previous owner was deemed inapplicable, with ownership determined from 2-11-2004. The market value as of 1-4-1981 was not considered for computation, and indexation benefits were denied due to the short-term nature of the capital gain.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 682 - ITAT, CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208631</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal upheld that the capital gain from the property sale was short-term, based on the property being held for less than 36 months. The cost of the land to the previous owner was deemed inapplicable, with ownership determined from 2-11-2004. The market value as of 1-4-1981 was not considered for computation, and indexation benefits were denied due to the short-term nature of the capital gain.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>