<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 894 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208623</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to assess property income based on the rental value declared by NMMC, rejecting the department&#039;s estimated rate approach. The ITAT modified the restriction on site expenses disallowance from 5% to 10% and adjusted sub-contract expenses disallowance amounts for various assessment years. The ITAT&#039;s judgment balanced the interests of the department and the assessee, providing detailed reasoning for each decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 08:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 894 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208623</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to assess property income based on the rental value declared by NMMC, rejecting the department&#039;s estimated rate approach. The ITAT modified the restriction on site expenses disallowance from 5% to 10% and adjusted sub-contract expenses disallowance amounts for various assessment years. The ITAT&#039;s judgment balanced the interests of the department and the assessee, providing detailed reasoning for each decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208623</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>