https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208619 The court reversed the rejection of refund claims for CENVAT credit on 'courier service' for a specific period. The appellant's alternative plea for re-credit of amounts in their CENVAT account was considered, emphasizing procedural fairness. The judge remanded the cases to the original authority for a fresh decision on the re-credit request, stressing the importance of raising all relevant issues before the appropriate authorities. This approach ensured the appellant could pursue relief through proper channels, reflecting a balanced resolution of the refund claims. en-us Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208619 The court reversed the rejection of refund claims for CENVAT credit on 'courier service' for a specific period. The appellant's alternative plea for re-credit of amounts in their CENVAT account was considered, emphasizing procedural fairness. The judge remanded the cases to the original authority for a fresh decision on the re-credit request, stressing the importance of raising all relevant issues before the appropriate authorities. This approach ensured the appellant could pursue relief through proper channels, reflecting a balanced resolution of the refund claims. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208619