<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 253 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208602</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that Sections 194C(1) and (2) of the IT Act did not apply to the assessee for the assessment year 2006-07. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 33,27,188/- was deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed. The decision of the Hon&#039;ble Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court in a similar case was distinguished as not applicable to the present circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 253 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208602</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that Sections 194C(1) and (2) of the IT Act did not apply to the assessee for the assessment year 2006-07. Consequently, the addition of Rs. 33,27,188/- was deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed. The decision of the Hon&#039;ble Punjab &amp;amp; Haryana High Court in a similar case was distinguished as not applicable to the present circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>