<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 633 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208576</link>
    <description>The revision applications challenging orders-in-appeal rejecting rebate claims and refund requests under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 were disposed of in favor of the applicant. The Central Government allowed duty rebate on transaction value under Section 4 and granted recredit in the Cenvat account for duty on post-clearance expenses. The applicant was found entitled to credit for duty paid on freight and insurance charges, leading to modifications in the orders-in-appeal and orders-in-original.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 10:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=182038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 633 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208576</link>
      <description>The revision applications challenging orders-in-appeal rejecting rebate claims and refund requests under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 were disposed of in favor of the applicant. The Central Government allowed duty rebate on transaction value under Section 4 and granted recredit in the Cenvat account for duty on post-clearance expenses. The applicant was found entitled to credit for duty paid on freight and insurance charges, leading to modifications in the orders-in-appeal and orders-in-original.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>