https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208575 The Tribunal found that the evidence presented by the Revenue did not substantiate the allegations of clandestine removal against Sulekhram, setting aside the demand and penalties. The penalties imposed on partners of M/s. A.S. Corporation were also overturned due to lack of evidence. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, dismissing the appeals as no legal issues were identified. en-us Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Jan 2012 12:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208575 The Tribunal found that the evidence presented by the Revenue did not substantiate the allegations of clandestine removal against Sulekhram, setting aside the demand and penalties. The penalties imposed on partners of M/s. A.S. Corporation were also overturned due to lack of evidence. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, dismissing the appeals as no legal issues were identified. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208575