https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208544 The Court directed the respondents not to recover the disputed demand until the Commissioner (Appeals) decided on the application for stay. The Commissioner was urged to expedite the stay application process, with a specific instruction for the petitioner to cooperate and avoid seeking unnecessary adjournments during the proceedings. The Court disposed of the writ petition, providing clear directions to ensure a fair resolution of the disputed duty demand issue while emphasizing the need for expeditious decision-making by the Commissioner (Appeals) to address the pending stay application effectively. en-us Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208544 The Court directed the respondents not to recover the disputed demand until the Commissioner (Appeals) decided on the application for stay. The Commissioner was urged to expedite the stay application process, with a specific instruction for the petitioner to cooperate and avoid seeking unnecessary adjournments during the proceedings. The Court disposed of the writ petition, providing clear directions to ensure a fair resolution of the disputed duty demand issue while emphasizing the need for expeditious decision-making by the Commissioner (Appeals) to address the pending stay application effectively. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208544