https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208540 The appeals were dismissed by the court due to significant delay in filing, lack of explanation or condonation of delay, and lack of evidence supporting the owner's illness in restoration applications. The court upheld the Tribunal's decision to reject restoration applications, finding no legal infirmity in the decision. The dismissal was based on the time-barred nature of the challenge against the CEGAT's order and the absence of any substantial question of law. No costs were awarded in the case. en-us Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208540 The appeals were dismissed by the court due to significant delay in filing, lack of explanation or condonation of delay, and lack of evidence supporting the owner's illness in restoration applications. The court upheld the Tribunal's decision to reject restoration applications, finding no legal infirmity in the decision. The dismissal was based on the time-barred nature of the challenge against the CEGAT's order and the absence of any substantial question of law. No costs were awarded in the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208540