<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 39 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208534</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed on an association of persons in penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05. The Court ruled that where two views are possible, a penalty cannot be imposed on the assessee, finding no substantial question of law warranting further consideration and dismissing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 39 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208534</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed on an association of persons in penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2003-04 and 2004-05. The Court ruled that where two views are possible, a penalty cannot be imposed on the assessee, finding no substantial question of law warranting further consideration and dismissing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>