<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 879 - ITAT, Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208524</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, directing the deletion of the addition of Rs.2 lakhs under Section 69. It was concluded that the amount belonged to Sri B.V. Ganapathy and not the appellant, as evidenced by the repayment through a cheque and utilization by Ganapathy. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of thorough verification and evidence before attributing unexplained income to an assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 879 - ITAT, Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208524</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, directing the deletion of the addition of Rs.2 lakhs under Section 69. It was concluded that the amount belonged to Sri B.V. Ganapathy and not the appellant, as evidenced by the repayment through a cheque and utilization by Ganapathy. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of thorough verification and evidence before attributing unexplained income to an assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>