<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 677 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208500</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act on the assessee. The decision was based on the finding that the inadvertent error in claiming expenses in the company&#039;s first year, without any active business operations, did not warrant a penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 677 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208500</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act on the assessee. The decision was based on the finding that the inadvertent error in claiming expenses in the company&#039;s first year, without any active business operations, did not warrant a penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>