<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 795 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208496</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the amount collected for the Haryana Seeds Certification Agency was not considered income but collected on behalf of the agency. Additionally, the assessee was confirmed as the rightful owner of the plant and machinery, entitling them to depreciation and investment allowances. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were upheld, emphasizing the contractual details and ownership status of the assets.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181959" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 795 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208496</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the amount collected for the Haryana Seeds Certification Agency was not considered income but collected on behalf of the agency. Additionally, the assessee was confirmed as the rightful owner of the plant and machinery, entitling them to depreciation and investment allowances. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were upheld, emphasizing the contractual details and ownership status of the assets.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>