<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (8) TMI 709 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208486</link>
    <description>The Judge allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals to vacate the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) setting aside the demand of interest and penalties imposed by the original authority. The Judge reinstated the penalties for deliberate tax evasion, emphasizing that payment before the issue of show cause notice did not absolve the respondents from liability to penalties. The decision stressed the significance of adhering to current legal precedents and ensuring penalties are imposed in cases of willful tax evasion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181949" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (8) TMI 709 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208486</link>
      <description>The Judge allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals to vacate the orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) setting aside the demand of interest and penalties imposed by the original authority. The Judge reinstated the penalties for deliberate tax evasion, emphasizing that payment before the issue of show cause notice did not absolve the respondents from liability to penalties. The decision stressed the significance of adhering to current legal precedents and ensuring penalties are imposed in cases of willful tax evasion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>