<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 739 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208485</link>
    <description>The tribunal directed each appellant to make a pre-deposit of 20% of the service tax demanded within a specified timeframe, while waiving the pre-deposit of the balance pending the appeal&#039;s disposal. The judgment addressed the levy of service tax, the challenge to the classification of the appellants as commission agents, and the determination of whether the service provided constituted business auxiliary service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 739 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208485</link>
      <description>The tribunal directed each appellant to make a pre-deposit of 20% of the service tax demanded within a specified timeframe, while waiving the pre-deposit of the balance pending the appeal&#039;s disposal. The judgment addressed the levy of service tax, the challenge to the classification of the appellants as commission agents, and the determination of whether the service provided constituted business auxiliary service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208485</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>