<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 30 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208481</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing the assessee to pay a reduced penalty within 30 days under Section 11 AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s intervention justified due to the initial lack of clarity in penalty imposition by the Assistant Commissioner. By aligning the orders with statutory provisions, the Tribunal corrected the penalty process errors. The Court emphasized procedural compliance and the assessee&#039;s right to avail reduced penalties within the stipulated timeframe, ultimately dismissing the appeal without raising substantial legal questions under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 30 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208481</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing the assessee to pay a reduced penalty within 30 days under Section 11 AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s intervention justified due to the initial lack of clarity in penalty imposition by the Assistant Commissioner. By aligning the orders with statutory provisions, the Tribunal corrected the penalty process errors. The Court emphasized procedural compliance and the assessee&#039;s right to avail reduced penalties within the stipulated timeframe, ultimately dismissing the appeal without raising substantial legal questions under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>