<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 25 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208467</link>
    <description>The case involved an appeal by the Revenue against the disallowance of interest expenses for the assessment year 2007-08. The tribunal held that the interest income received from PFC was capital in nature and not taxable under Section 57 of the Income Tax Act. The interest income and expenditure were linked to the project&#039;s setup, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 25 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208467</link>
      <description>The case involved an appeal by the Revenue against the disallowance of interest expenses for the assessment year 2007-08. The tribunal held that the interest income received from PFC was capital in nature and not taxable under Section 57 of the Income Tax Act. The interest income and expenditure were linked to the project&#039;s setup, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>