<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 869 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208458</link>
    <description>The case involved various tax issues such as amortization of premium on leasehold land, capital advances written off, technical service fees, and other expenses. The Tribunal dismissed certain claims, disallowed others, and remanded some issues for fresh consideration. Ultimately, the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The order was pronounced on 13.1.2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 869 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208458</link>
      <description>The case involved various tax issues such as amortization of premium on leasehold land, capital advances written off, technical service fees, and other expenses. The Tribunal dismissed certain claims, disallowed others, and remanded some issues for fresh consideration. Ultimately, the assessee&#039;s appeal was partly allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes. The order was pronounced on 13.1.2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>