<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 19 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208446</link>
    <description>The High Court held that glass bottles and crates used for selling beverages, which are re-usable, are not exigible to excise duty. The Court emphasized that excise duty cannot be imposed on containers when there is a factual finding that only beverages are sold without the bottles and crates. As a result, the appeals (CEA Nos. 114 and 115 of 2011) were dismissed, with a direction to place a copy of the order on the file of the connected appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 19 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208446</link>
      <description>The High Court held that glass bottles and crates used for selling beverages, which are re-usable, are not exigible to excise duty. The Court emphasized that excise duty cannot be imposed on containers when there is a factual finding that only beverages are sold without the bottles and crates. As a result, the appeals (CEA Nos. 114 and 115 of 2011) were dismissed, with a direction to place a copy of the order on the file of the connected appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>