<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 875 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208442</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and dismissed the appeal. It was determined that the adjudicating authority exceeded its jurisdiction by ordering the appropriation of funds without following the correct legal process and lacking the authority to review its own orders. The ruling emphasized adherence to the provisions of Notification No. 56/2002-CE and established procedures for the recovery of erroneously refunded amounts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 875 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208442</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and dismissed the appeal. It was determined that the adjudicating authority exceeded its jurisdiction by ordering the appropriation of funds without following the correct legal process and lacking the authority to review its own orders. The ruling emphasized adherence to the provisions of Notification No. 56/2002-CE and established procedures for the recovery of erroneously refunded amounts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>