<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (1) TMI 17 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208439</link>
    <description>Flexible plastic films and poly paper used in contractual testing of customised machines qualified as inputs used in or in relation to manufacture under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Court treated the testing process as part of manufacture because the machines were built to customer specifications and could not be regarded as complete or marketable until they passed the required testing. As marketability is an attribute of manufacture, and the revenue did not prove that the machines were saleable before testing, Modvat credit was admissible. The High Court&#039;s contrary answers were set aside and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2015 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (1) TMI 17 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208439</link>
      <description>Flexible plastic films and poly paper used in contractual testing of customised machines qualified as inputs used in or in relation to manufacture under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Court treated the testing process as part of manufacture because the machines were built to customer specifications and could not be regarded as complete or marketable until they passed the required testing. As marketability is an attribute of manufacture, and the revenue did not prove that the machines were saleable before testing, Modvat credit was admissible. The High Court&#039;s contrary answers were set aside and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>