<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 736 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208419</link>
    <description>The court found that catering service tax credit was not admissible for manufacturing finished goods. The judge upheld the demand for service tax and interest, setting aside the penalty imposed, based on a previous Tribunal order considering a Larger Bench decision and a Supreme Court ruling. The Department&#039;s appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 09:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 736 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208419</link>
      <description>The court found that catering service tax credit was not admissible for manufacturing finished goods. The judge upheld the demand for service tax and interest, setting aside the penalty imposed, based on a previous Tribunal order considering a Larger Bench decision and a Supreme Court ruling. The Department&#039;s appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>