<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 862 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208378</link>
    <description>Duty liability in depot clearance valuation had to be computed on the basis of all clearances taken together, and not by isolating only higher-value sales while ignoring transactions on which higher duty had already been paid. Excess duty paid on some clearances had to be neutralised against any short payment on others, so the demand could not stand without recomputation on complete clearance data. As the computation required fresh examination, limitation also had to be reconsidered by the adjudicating authority. The order confirming duty, penalty and interest was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 19:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 862 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208378</link>
      <description>Duty liability in depot clearance valuation had to be computed on the basis of all clearances taken together, and not by isolating only higher-value sales while ignoring transactions on which higher duty had already been paid. Excess duty paid on some clearances had to be neutralised against any short payment on others, so the demand could not stand without recomputation on complete clearance data. As the computation required fresh examination, limitation also had to be reconsidered by the adjudicating authority. The order confirming duty, penalty and interest was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>