<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 820 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208376</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision rejecting waiver of the pre-deposit condition but reduced the deposit amount from Rs. 30 lakhs to Rs. 10 lakhs due to the petitioner&#039;s financial constraints. The reduced payment would stay the pre-deposit requirement for the remaining duty and penalty amounts pending appeal, with a directive for expeditious appeal resolution. The Court emphasized discretion in such matters based on the prima facie case presented, declining to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s decision despite the petitioner&#039;s argument regarding a Coordinate Benches decision. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, closing all connected matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 820 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208376</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision rejecting waiver of the pre-deposit condition but reduced the deposit amount from Rs. 30 lakhs to Rs. 10 lakhs due to the petitioner&#039;s financial constraints. The reduced payment would stay the pre-deposit requirement for the remaining duty and penalty amounts pending appeal, with a directive for expeditious appeal resolution. The Court emphasized discretion in such matters based on the prima facie case presented, declining to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s decision despite the petitioner&#039;s argument regarding a Coordinate Benches decision. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, closing all connected matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>