https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208374 The Tribunal dismissed the applications for restoration of appeals due to the absence of the applicants on the hearing date and the delay in approaching the Tribunal for restoration. Despite the claim that the Manager failed to inform the applicants about the hearing, the Tribunal found insufficient evidence supporting their ignorance. Citing legal precedent, the Tribunal emphasized the necessity of demonstrating valid reasons for absence and delay in seeking restoration. As the applicants failed to provide justifiable cause for their absence and delay, the applications were deemed lacking in merit and were dismissed. en-us Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Aug 2013 10:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208374 The Tribunal dismissed the applications for restoration of appeals due to the absence of the applicants on the hearing date and the delay in approaching the Tribunal for restoration. Despite the claim that the Manager failed to inform the applicants about the hearing, the Tribunal found insufficient evidence supporting their ignorance. Citing legal precedent, the Tribunal emphasized the necessity of demonstrating valid reasons for absence and delay in seeking restoration. As the applicants failed to provide justifiable cause for their absence and delay, the applications were deemed lacking in merit and were dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 03 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208374