https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208343 The Government rejected the revision applications as the rebate claims were deemed inadmissible due to the applicant's failure to meet the conditions outlined in Notification No. 19/2004-C.E. (N.T.). The Commissioner's decision not to extend the export period was upheld, emphasizing the finality of his discretionary powers. The procedural non-compliance by the applicant led to the dismissal of the revision applications for lack of merit. en-us Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Jan 2012 16:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208343 The Government rejected the revision applications as the rebate claims were deemed inadmissible due to the applicant's failure to meet the conditions outlined in Notification No. 19/2004-C.E. (N.T.). The Commissioner's decision not to extend the export period was upheld, emphasizing the finality of his discretionary powers. The procedural non-compliance by the applicant led to the dismissal of the revision applications for lack of merit. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208343