<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 931 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208336</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the respondent&#039;s order for failure to pass a separate speaking order addressing objections raised under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The respondent was directed to consider the objections and issue a speaking order within eight weeks. The judgment emphasized the necessity of complying with legal procedures and providing reasons when dealing with objections under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2021 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 931 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208336</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the respondent&#039;s order for failure to pass a separate speaking order addressing objections raised under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The respondent was directed to consider the objections and issue a speaking order within eight weeks. The judgment emphasized the necessity of complying with legal procedures and providing reasons when dealing with objections under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>