<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 928 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208310</link>
    <description>Service tax credit was denied because only photocopies of invoices were produced, but the dispute depended on factual verification of whether the original invoices existed and were genuine. The tribunal held that the appellant should have been given a further opportunity to produce the originals, as the admissibility of the credit claim could not be decided without that verification. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for fresh consideration after allowing production of the original invoices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 928 - CESTAT, AHEMDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208310</link>
      <description>Service tax credit was denied because only photocopies of invoices were produced, but the dispute depended on factual verification of whether the original invoices existed and were genuine. The tribunal held that the appellant should have been given a further opportunity to produce the originals, as the admissibility of the credit claim could not be decided without that verification. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for fresh consideration after allowing production of the original invoices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>