<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 635 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208307</link>
    <description>The High Court emphasized the importance of adhering to guidelines and court judgments in encashing bank guarantees. The respondents were warned that failure to follow guidelines and court judgments would result in serious consequences, with the officer encashing the guarantee being held personally liable for breaching the order and circular. The judgment highlighted the need for compliance and issued a stern warning to ensure future adherence to prescribed procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 635 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208307</link>
      <description>The High Court emphasized the importance of adhering to guidelines and court judgments in encashing bank guarantees. The respondents were warned that failure to follow guidelines and court judgments would result in serious consequences, with the officer encashing the guarantee being held personally liable for breaching the order and circular. The judgment highlighted the need for compliance and issued a stern warning to ensure future adherence to prescribed procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>