<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 730 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208296</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that section 80-I(8) of the Income-tax Act was not applicable as the goods were transferred at market price, thus rejecting the Assessing Officer&#039;s adjustment. The Court emphasized the significance of factual evidence and market value in determining tax deduction eligibility, ultimately deciding against the Revenue and in favor of the assessee for the assessment year 1989-90.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 18:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 730 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208296</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that section 80-I(8) of the Income-tax Act was not applicable as the goods were transferred at market price, thus rejecting the Assessing Officer&#039;s adjustment. The Court emphasized the significance of factual evidence and market value in determining tax deduction eligibility, ultimately deciding against the Revenue and in favor of the assessee for the assessment year 1989-90.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>