<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 828 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208295</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal declined to condone the inordinate delay of 1695 days in filing the appeal challenging the order passed under section 201(1) r.w.s 192 of the I.T. Act for the A.Y. 2000-01. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s explanation for the delay unconvincing and lacking a reasonable cause, leading to the dismissal of the appeal against the order of the Ld CIT(A) dated 15.3.2002. The decision was upheld on 22.2.2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 18:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181766" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 828 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208295</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal declined to condone the inordinate delay of 1695 days in filing the appeal challenging the order passed under section 201(1) r.w.s 192 of the I.T. Act for the A.Y. 2000-01. The Tribunal found the assessee&#039;s explanation for the delay unconvincing and lacking a reasonable cause, leading to the dismissal of the appeal against the order of the Ld CIT(A) dated 15.3.2002. The decision was upheld on 22.2.2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>