<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 837 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208294</link>
    <description>The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Departmental appeal, upholding the cancellation of the penalty under section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal found that the disallowance of the deduction was due to a mere difference of opinion and not deliberate omission or inaccurate particulars. The appellant had disclosed all relevant facts, leading to the cancellation of the penalty. The final judgment was pronounced on January 11, 2010.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 16:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 837 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208294</link>
      <description>The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Departmental appeal, upholding the cancellation of the penalty under section 271(1)(c). The Tribunal found that the disallowance of the deduction was due to a mere difference of opinion and not deliberate omission or inaccurate particulars. The appellant had disclosed all relevant facts, leading to the cancellation of the penalty. The final judgment was pronounced on January 11, 2010.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>