<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 836 - ITAT, Chennai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208293</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by the Revenue. It ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding the notional carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation and the classification of machinery replacement expenditure. However, the Tribunal sided with the assessee on the eligibility of windmills as separate business undertakings under section 80IA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 836 - ITAT, Chennai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208293</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals by the Revenue. It ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding the notional carry forward of unabsorbed depreciation and the classification of machinery replacement expenditure. However, the Tribunal sided with the assessee on the eligibility of windmills as separate business undertakings under section 80IA.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>