<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 824 - ITAT, Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208259</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed the appeal and cross-objection as the deemed dividend addition could not be sustained in the assessee firm&#039;s hands due to the lack of shareholder status required by section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal emphasized the importance of legal interpretations and factual considerations in tax matters, ensuring adherence to the Act&#039;s provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 02:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 824 - ITAT, Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208259</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal dismissed the appeal and cross-objection as the deemed dividend addition could not be sustained in the assessee firm&#039;s hands due to the lack of shareholder status required by section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal emphasized the importance of legal interpretations and factual considerations in tax matters, ensuring adherence to the Act&#039;s provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>