<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 832 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208258</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeals, affirming the treatment of the assessee as a professional under sections 194C(1) and 194J for most payments. However, it ruled that art work and photography payments should be considered contractual under section 194C(1), modifying the CIT(A) order in this regard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 14:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181729" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 832 - ITAT, Mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208258</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeals, affirming the treatment of the assessee as a professional under sections 194C(1) and 194J for most payments. However, it ruled that art work and photography payments should be considered contractual under section 194C(1), modifying the CIT(A) order in this regard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>