https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208253 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad rejected the appeal by the appellant concerning the refund claim rejection and interest demand under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant failed to establish a case for the refund as the service for which the tax was paid was not on the notified list. Despite misquoting the law in demanding interest under Section 75, the Tribunal upheld the interest demand, stating that the appellant had the opportunity to contest it. The appeal was dismissed with no merits found in the appellant's arguments. en-us Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Jan 2013 11:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208253 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad rejected the appeal by the appellant concerning the refund claim rejection and interest demand under Section 75 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellant failed to establish a case for the refund as the service for which the tax was paid was not on the notified list. Despite misquoting the law in demanding interest under Section 75, the Tribunal upheld the interest demand, stating that the appellant had the opportunity to contest it. The appeal was dismissed with no merits found in the appellant's arguments. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 28 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208253