https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208250 A Tribunal declined to modify a stay order requiring pre-deposit, holding that the earlier prima facie view against the assessee remained undisturbed. It found that the authorities cited for waiver or reduction involved different facts and different assessees, and no binding precedent overlooked in the original order was shown. As no fresh claim of financial hardship was made, the request was treated as an impermissible attempt to review the Tribunal's own order. The pre-deposit direction was therefore maintained. en-us Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jan 2012 17:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208250 A Tribunal declined to modify a stay order requiring pre-deposit, holding that the earlier prima facie view against the assessee remained undisturbed. It found that the authorities cited for waiver or reduction involved different facts and different assessees, and no binding precedent overlooked in the original order was shown. As no fresh claim of financial hardship was made, the request was treated as an impermissible attempt to review the Tribunal's own order. The pre-deposit direction was therefore maintained. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208250