https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208247 In an appeal against acquittal, the appellate court may reappreciate evidence but must respect the reinforced presumption of innocence. Interference is justified only if the trial court's view is perverse, manifestly illegal, or ignores material evidence; where two reasonable conclusions are possible, the acquittal should stand. Applying that standard, the trial court's reliance on material contradictions, lack of independent support, doubts in the prosecution version, and evidentiary gaps was found to be a reasonable view, and no basis existed to disturb the acquittal. en-us Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jan 2012 01:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208247 In an appeal against acquittal, the appellate court may reappreciate evidence but must respect the reinforced presumption of innocence. Interference is justified only if the trial court's view is perverse, manifestly illegal, or ignores material evidence; where two reasonable conclusions are possible, the acquittal should stand. Applying that standard, the trial court's reliance on material contradictions, lack of independent support, doubts in the prosecution version, and evidentiary gaps was found to be a reasonable view, and no basis existed to disturb the acquittal. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208247