<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 198 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208244</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the duty payment liability but reduced the penalty under Rule 25(1) to Rs.5,000 due to financial challenges leading to factory closure and subsequent payment delays. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed with the adjusted penalty amount, acknowledging mitigating circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 16:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 198 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208244</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the duty payment liability but reduced the penalty under Rule 25(1) to Rs.5,000 due to financial challenges leading to factory closure and subsequent payment delays. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed with the adjusted penalty amount, acknowledging mitigating circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>