https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208240 The Tribunal upheld the duty demand and penalties imposed on an Appellant firm for alleged clandestine removal of motor vehicle parts chargeable to Central Excise duty. The decision was based on evidence of unaccounted receipt of rough forgings, justifying the Department's method for determining the balance of forgings. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, finding no infirmity in the impugned order and supporting the Department's approach in determining the stock of rough forgings. en-us Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208240 The Tribunal upheld the duty demand and penalties imposed on an Appellant firm for alleged clandestine removal of motor vehicle parts chargeable to Central Excise duty. The decision was based on evidence of unaccounted receipt of rough forgings, justifying the Department's method for determining the balance of forgings. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, finding no infirmity in the impugned order and supporting the Department's approach in determining the stock of rough forgings. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208240