<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 184 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208211</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding a refund claim under the Sugar Export Promotion Act, 1958, amounting to Rs. 21,63,625/-. The Commissioner (Appeals) ruled in favor of the appellants, ordering the refund to be credited to the Consumer Welfare fund due to passing the duty burden to customers. The Tribunal found that the burden of duty had been passed on to customers, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and the Revenue&#039;s Cross-objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=181682" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 184 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208211</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding a refund claim under the Sugar Export Promotion Act, 1958, amounting to Rs. 21,63,625/-. The Commissioner (Appeals) ruled in favor of the appellants, ordering the refund to be credited to the Consumer Welfare fund due to passing the duty burden to customers. The Tribunal found that the burden of duty had been passed on to customers, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and the Revenue&#039;s Cross-objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>