https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208204 The court upheld the policy's forfeiture clause for non-fulfillment of export obligations, emphasizing the petitioner's prior acceptance of the terms. It cited precedents supporting the government's right to formulate such policies in the public interest. The rejection of the force-majeure claim due to insufficient evidence was also upheld, highlighting the necessity of concrete proof in such cases. The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the rationality of the policy and the validity of the decisions by the AEPC and Appellate Committees. en-us Mon, 17 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jan 2012 07:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208204 The court upheld the policy's forfeiture clause for non-fulfillment of export obligations, emphasizing the petitioner's prior acceptance of the terms. It cited precedents supporting the government's right to formulate such policies in the public interest. The rejection of the force-majeure claim due to insufficient evidence was also upheld, highlighting the necessity of concrete proof in such cases. The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the rationality of the policy and the validity of the decisions by the AEPC and Appellate Committees. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 17 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=208204